Blog

Welcome

This is the blog for professional photographers, and those who aspire to be. Our aim is to help professional photographers build long-term, sustainable careers.
loading facebook page
This post won't mean much to those of you who's knowledge of social media is limited to, "You know, Facebook and Twitter etc". But the rest of us are trying to get good at it without feeling like it consumes all our time. Anyway, I've just been asked my opinions about automation and social media. It's something I feel strongly about, and my advice is to "approach with caution". Here's why. 1. We're in the 'intimacy business', and automation is usually the the enemy of intimacy. If I skype my wife, "Hi darling – love you!", we both feel good about it. It was impulsive and heartfelt. Automate it and I turn it into marketing. I lose trust instead of gaining it. 2. Social media is about "making connections". That could mean making friendships or simply "getting noticed" (what Seth Godin calls "interrupting people"). Automating tweets to re-syndicate old posts is just advertising. It may have some value, but let's call it what it is. You don't see Seth recycling his old content, and he posts every day. We don't recycle either. 3. I don't want to see the same tweet from you multiple times a day just to "make sure I see it". As soon as I pay you the compliment of adding you to my insider list (instead of reading your posts in my timeline) I'll see the game you're playing. A big turnoff. You're no longer authentic and I will probably "unfollow". Especially if you're pumping out a constant stream of stuff. 4. Who am I following? Three times in the last week people have asked me, "Who d'you think is behind Jasmine Star?" (on Facebook). Their point was, it feels automated because there's no dialogue with readers. Don't get me wrong: I admire her, and what's she's done, and I'm jealous of her following. But you don't want people wondering if you're for real, and automation makes this much more likely. Compare Jasmine with @garyvee (Gary Vaynerchuk). Not saying his is the only way to do things, but there is no doubt he's real. Check out "The Thank You Economy." 5. There is a slap (cost) to automation. Facebook especially makes your content lower priority if you automate it. We used to do this with blog posts but not any more. Now that we handcraft the posts, they get much more traffic and interaction. There is plenty of content on the web about this – this, for example. As I said we're in the intimacy business. Most photographers need about 30-50 weddings a year. That's 50 odd relationships to be treasured, talked about and shared. The real key to success is not for you to jump up and down more, but for your fans to spread the word. It's not the size of the audience but the degree of engagement that counts. Having said all that, we do use automation, Tweetdeck in my case. It makes life so much easier. Give it a try, but please please please don't turn your tweets into spam. Love to all, and have fun.
This entry was posted in by Admin | Leave a Comment
Suzanne Doughty
on
June 15, 2011, 4:44 am
said:
Great post, Stephen. I think your examples are right on point. It's sometimes tough to walk that automation-vs-authenticity line because we're all so short of time, but better to err on the side of real-time engagement.
 
Reply
Stephen Baugh
on
June 14, 2011, 4:38 am
said:
In the interest of full disclosure it does seem someone here (probably me) turned the auto publish to Facebook plugin back on. We certainly don't do that on the Brand blog and in the interest of eating my own cooking I am turning it off :-)
 
Reply
Ian Baugh
on
June 16, 2011, 10:35 am
said:
Personally I suspect you're not, Mark. But twitter is not just a marketing tool but also a service/direct messaging tool, like email, texting, skype, IM, etc etc … including the good ol' phone. Also a listening device (what are people saying about you?) One of the challenges is deciding where and how do you make yourself available to communicate (setting expectations) and where and how do you "listen in"? Here's an interesting post from Seth: http://sethgodin.typepad.com/
 
Reply
Stephen Baugh
on
June 15, 2011, 6:31 am
said:
Thank you Suzanne. I was asked last night if I was completely against automation, I'm not. I just don't think a piece of computer software is  a good proxy of ourselves, and when we pretend that it is it's usually easy to spot and not very authentic.
 
Reply
Stephen Baugh
on
June 15, 2011, 6:31 am
said:
Thank you Suzanne. I was asked last night if I was completely against automation, I'm not. I just don't think a piece of computer software is  a good proxy of ourselves, and when we pretend that it is it's usually easy to spot and not very authentic.
 
Reply
Nicola
on
June 15, 2011, 11:00 am
said:
Amen!  And I'm glad someone said it :-)
 
Reply
Ian Baugh
on
June 16, 2011, 10:36 am
said:
And yes, grist for another blog post.
 
Reply
M Miller
on
June 15, 2011, 6:05 am
said:
Very interesting post Stephen. Going off at a slight tangent (and possibly for another post) is the role of Twitter for wedding photographers.  I get (and use) Facebook - very personal and clearly of value from a business perspective, but I don't see twitter in the same way.  It seems to me that the Photographers who use twitter are being followed by other photographers, not potential wedding clients.  Am I wrong? Mark 
 
Reply